COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

May 8, 2008

 

** NOT APPROVED **


            The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Curtis W. Crandall, who then led in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.  Invocation was led by Mr. Pullen.

 

Roll Call: Chairman C. Crandall, G. Benson, D. Burdick, W. Dibble, D. Fanton, W. Hall, T. Hopkins, K. Kruger, M. McCormick, T. O’Grady, D. Pullen, B. Reynolds, D. Russo, R. Truax, N. Ungermann

 

Others Present:  A. Finnemore, P. Gallmann, R. Hall, J. Margeson, T. Miner, B. Riehle, R. Swarthout, W. Tompkins;  Media:  K. Doyle, Olean Times Herald; B. Quinn, Wellsville Daily Reporter

 

Guests:  Insurance Representatives:  Richard Ewell, Richardson & Stout Insurance; Ron Oettel, Regional Director, Provident Benefits; 

            Allegany County Fire Advisory Board Representatives:  Jeff Luckey, Chairman; Ed Sackett, Vice-Chairman; Jud Stearns, Jr., Secretary;  

            Allegany County Fire Chiefs’ Association Representatives:  (David Hardman, President, was unable to attend); Wayne Hatch, Vice-President; David Sweet, Secretary;

            Volunteer Firemen’s Association of Allegany County Representatives:  (Chris Perkins, President, was unable to attend); John Wilson, First Vice-President; Terry Richardson, Second Vice-President

 

Chairman Curtis W. Crandall’s Opening Remarks:

 

            Chairman Crandall introduced the guests, and summarized that the purpose of the meeting was for an insurance presentation and to discuss thoughts and ideas and field questions from the emergency responder groups.  Those attending from the three groups listed above represent 1,278 Volunteer Firemen and 174 Emergency Medical Service personnel.

 

Sheriff William R. Tompkins’ Comments:

 

            Sheriff Tompkins spoke on dispatch communication issues.  He gave an update about what they’re doing in the Dispatch Center.  They’re trying to address issues that affect some of the transmission and clarity issues, which should make a noticeable difference.  Sheriff Tompkins has applied for federal grants that would allow updating all of the system.  He has not had a lot of contact from Fire Service personnel about dispatch problems, and if he doesn’t know about the problems, he can’t deal with them.  The Sheriff asked that personnel call him with concerns, so he can try to address the issues.  If there is a problem heard on the radio, the date and time will allow them to research it, and in a short period of time they can find the situation, review it, and come to a conclusion.  Of the communication the Sheriff has had, the vast majority of problems have not been dispatch error, but there have been reasons for the occurrences and he’s addressed them with the people concerned.  He doesn’t want to see the dispatchers unfairly blamed.  Another issue has been Sheriff Tompkins’ inability to attend Fire Service meetings, but he realizes the need for better communication and will correct that.

 

            Chairman Crandall commented on the excellent conversation at the Public Safety Committee meeting on May 7 with the Sheriff, Russ Hall, and the Legislators, about Dispatch Center questions, answers, and ideas.  The Sheriff had mentioned public informational meetings, and Chairman Crandall stressed again that communication is key.

 

Insurance Presentation:

 

            Richard L. Ewell, Richardson & Stout Insurance, was recently asked by a fire company about accident insurance.  Provident has the most comprehensive policy Mr. Ewell could find.  This is important coverage, and he felt all the emergency responders in the County should have it.  He gave a presentation at the Personnel Committee meeting and was asked to come tonight.

 

            Ron Oettel, Regional Director, Provident Benefits, gave a short history of the agency and summarized benefits provided for emergency services organizations.  In the beginning, their coverage looked like Workers’ Compensation, but then evolved into supplemental coverage to fill gaps in Workers’ Compensation coverage.  Provident provides financial benefits for firefighters and their families if they are hurt or killed while serving their communities.  All classes of membership are covered.  The definition of when coverage is provided is very broad, including all normal activities of the organization, beginning when the insured interrupts his normal routine to act on behalf of the organization and ending when he returns to normal activities.  Coverage is also provided for heart attacks and when acting in the capacity of a “good Samaritan,” providing the action is within the scope of training.  A highlight of the five major benefit categories includes:

 

1.         Death Benefit or “Principal Sum” of the policy

·         In the event of a death from a covered injury or illness, the Principal Sum would be paid to the beneficiary

·         The Principal Sum amount is the benefit limit for many other benefits in the policy such as Dismemberment, Permanent Physical Impairment, and Cosmetic Disfigurement from Burns

·         Numerous other benefits fall under the “Death Benefit” section

2.         Impairment Benefits

·         Dismemberment Benefits, Loss of Vision, Loss of Hearing

·         Permanent Physical Impairment for Injuries and Illnesses

3.         Income Protection

·         Pays Weekly Disability Benefits for covered injuries and illnesses

·         Total Disabilities caused by injuries are payable up to your lifetime

·         Total Disabilities caused by illnesses are payable up to age 67 or five years, whichever is greater

·         Partial Disabilities are payable up to age 67 or five years, whichever is greater, or normal retirement age

·         First Week Disability benefit of up to $1,000 in all policies

·         Cost of Living Adjustments allow your benefit to grow to 300 percent of the original limit

4.         Medical Expense

·         Provided for Injuries and Illnesses

·         Plastic Surgical Expense Benefit

5.         Family Assistance

·         Hospital Confinement

·         Family Expense Benefit – if you need medical treatment as a result of a covered injury or illness, and any immediate member of your family accompanies you for treatment or helps to treat you, we will pay reasonable and customary expenses incurred including the lost gross wages of that immediate family member

·         Mental Stress Management

·         Traumatic Incident

·         Health Insurance Premium Benefit

 

            Mr. Oettel offered to do presentations at individual fire companies.  Provident’s policy would be considered supplemental to Workers’ Compensation, with some benefits that resemble disability, and some benefits that are stand-alone.  Coverage is not contingent on Workers’ Compensation findings, and if Workers’ Compensation coverage is not there, they are.  Their claims service is the most important aspect of the business.

 

Discussion with Fire Service Representatives:

 

            Jeff Luckey thanked the Board for the invitation to discuss concerns of the fire service agencies.  He provided copies of “Injured in the Line of Duty, A Volunteer Firefighter’s and Ambulance Worker’s Guide to NYS Benefits” (copy attached to original minutes).  A listing of six main issues or concerns that the agencies would like to have addressed was presented by Mr. Luckey, Mr. Richardson, and Mr. Stearns:

 

1.         Some of the 1,278 Firemen and their families have lost faith in the Self-Insurance system.  How do we convince our members to continue providing emergency service as we are trained to do?  A fire chief recently remarked that several members expressed concerns about coverage being provided if needed, and some spouses don’t want them to participate because they may not be covered on compensable cases.  The agencies are losing membership.  It was already difficult to recruit members due to multiple jobs and family responsibilities, but now there is an additional challenge in finding new members when they are unsure if coverage will be there when needed.

 

2.         Would you, the Allegany County Board of Legislators, consider adopting a resolution to clarify the policy that would give the Self-Insurance Executive Secretary a clear definition of when we, as Firefighters and EMS personnel are covered by the Self-Insurance Plan?  Suggested Policy/Legal Opinion:

 

            (Department name) hereby issues the following policy statement:

            All members are expected to remain on duty at all times when present within the district, except when prohibited from responding as required by other policies of the Department (such as due to alcohol or physical disability).  It is the responsibility of any member of this Department to become involved in a rescue when able to do so.  The manner and method of how a member becomes involved is up to that individual member, whether it be by rendering medical aid, performing rescue services, calling 911, assisting in extrication, or fire police matters.  It is the full intent of this Department that any member performing services to the public as a firefighter shall be protected by all available insurances, including but not limited to VFBL.  Firefighters are hereby authorized to take any necessary and reasonable action to protect themselves and the public during an emergency, regardless of whether or not the Department has yet been activated.   

 

            All emergency services members expect to be covered by insurance when performing services they were trained for.  This covers some of the “good Samaritan” idea.

 

3.         Would you consider having a committee set up to advise the Executive Secretary on controverted decisions involving Fire Department claims if needed?  Our suggestion would be to have one representative each from the Allegany County Volunteer Firemen’s Association, the Allegany County Fire Advisory Board, and the Allegany County Fire Chiefs’ Association.  These members would be elected by their associations annually.  This group would meet with the Executive Secretary and be able to give their respective groups some insight as to how and why decisions are made the way they are.  This group would only meet on cases that were controverted.  We would ask that department names and names of individuals involved be kept from this group.  Any member of this group that has prior knowledge of an incident should be replaced with an alternate member.  The understanding is that presently most controverted cases are decided by one person, and we are interested in correcting the situation.  The blame or responsibility shouldn’t be placed on one person.  The proposed committee would be allowed to have input on how decisions are made and the opportunity to express concerns.  It would protect and keep open the lines of communication in these cases.

 

4.         When a claim is filed, what is the procedure that the Self-Insurance Plan follows?  Is there a certain dollar amount or type of claim that changes this procedure?  Does the Executive Secretary have a written protocol?  Emergency Services personnel are provided with a manual that includes guidelines on filing forms in a timely manner, and indicates that the Executive Secretary will then issue a decision on whether a claim is payable, but it doesn’t state how.  The Executive Secretary obviously follows Workers’ Compensation Law, but they have not seen the guidelines that are followed.  They would like to have written guidelines to give them a better idea of what is covered and how decisions are made.

 

5.         We acknowledge that there is a system in place to address Fire Department issues.  But there has been a lack of participation from both sides.  The Public Safety Committee changed their meeting times from evenings to days.  This puts a burden on the Fire Advisory Board representatives who have to leave their jobs to come to the meetings.  Public Safety Committee members are not attending Fire Advisory Board meetings.  We feel we need to have better communication and participation from the Public Safety Committee.

 

6.         There have been concerns from our members about the radio system and procedures.  We feel the basic system is good, but there is room for improvement.  Changes have been made to procedures with no consultation.  We are still gathering information and welcome the Sheriff’s invitation to conversation.

 

            Chairman Crandall questioned if the concern is whether the County is self-insured versus having a different insurance policy in place, or how the Self-Insurance Fund is perceived to be handled and claims accepted or denied.  Mr. Luckey responded that it is both.  If the Self-Insurance Plan is handled in a way that it appears to be a good policy, that’s good; but when there is doubt or a question of whether a procedure is beneficial, there is a problem with being self-insured.  Chairman Crandall noted that we could tie a couple of other concerns with this, such as the formation of a committee to meet and talk about claims with the Workers’ Compensation Administrator, ways to improve the self-insurance system now in place, protocol for determining claims, policy, and procedure.  Chairman Crandall noted that he has learned through his own research over the past year, that ideally it doesn’t make a difference whether the County is self-insured or has a policy through an insurance company or independent administrator; the determination lies within the Workers’ Compensation Law and New York State Law.  Interpretation and procedure is where the question lies.  Actually, if the County was covered through a larger insurance company, there is the conception that a lot of claims would just go through, when the opposite is true; they often deny claims.

 

            Mr. Reynolds noted that he appreciated Mr. Luckey’s comments and realized that one place we fall short is not involving the firemen in decisions.  The advisory committee is a good idea.  Policies and procedures can be given to the groups, but it would also be a good idea to involve them.  The “good Samaritan” issue should also be discussed to see what can be done.  We can work together to bring this to fruition.

 

            Mr. Truax also agreed with the idea of an advisory committee, and felt a representative from the Board of Legislators should also be on the committee to bring issues back to the Board.  The County Attorney should review the “good Samaritan” policy.

 

            Chairman Crandall commented that some of these ideas sound good, but what seems practical and makes common sense isn’t always possible if there is a legality that would preclude it.  Also, knowing and clarifying the policy and protocol for determination of claims as noted in #4 might address other concerns like the loss of faith and the formation of a committee to work with the fund administrator.  Understanding policy and procedure would be a good place to start.

 

            Mr. Pullen noted that the Personnel Committee has never voted or had any input on the processing of claims; the Board of Legislators has nothing to do with it.  Claims are governed by Workers’ Compensation Law and coverage is defined by law.  The County provides coverage identical to what would be covered by an insurance company, but basically insurance companies are in business to collect premiums, not pay claims.  Claims don’t increase or decrease due to self-insurance, which is not handling the coverage for profit.  Local communities ultimately pay for the benefits administered by the program.  No particular agency needs to choose the Self-Insurance Plan, but can choose another company.  The Self-Insurance Plan has been there for years, and undoubtedly there are ways to improve the system, but the further the insurance goes from the County, the less input and responsiveness we’ll have.  Mr. Pullen endorsed the services of the County’s volunteers and recognized the need to address their loss of faith, but reiterated that the existing Workers’ Compensation coverage is defined by the New York State Workers’ Compensation Law, not this Board of Legislators.  The County Attorney will have to advise the Board on what can be done in concert with NYS Law.  The issues are complex, and the law provides for an avenue to address them through the Workers’ Compensation Board.  Through better communication, hopefully we can improve things.

 

            Mr. Kruger noted that he attended a couple of Fire Advisory Board meetings and was confused by the layers of coverage.  Clarification is needed, and that will only happen if we have a committee in place to carry information back and forth.  It appears to the firemen that the Self-Insurance Plan doesn’t like to pay claims.  If anything positive can come of this, it would be clarification of self-insurance definitions and limiting the time period between claim and payment.  Mr. Kruger supports the firemen’s efforts.  Part of the problem with recruiting volunteers is that they’re worried about what will happen if they’re hurt.  If they were given a copy of the policy and an explanation as to why determinations are made, it would be a huge step in avoiding future problems and resolving some of their concerns.  The core of this problem is lack of explanation; even if the firemen don’t agree, at least they would have an explanation.  Mr. Kruger commented that he appreciates the firefighters’ time.  For every ten hours of active service, seven are spent raising money to support their activities, saving taxpayers’ dollars.  So it’s not just the up-front savings we see by their activities, but the unnoticed time they spend supporting their own costs.

 

            Mr. Luckey pointed out that the firefighters don’t have an agent speaking on their behalf and pointing out critical points in Workers’ Compensation claim determinations.  That would be part of the idea of a committee, and he agreed with having a Board member included.  Chairman Crandall noted that if the County ends up with a different system in place, either self-funded or not, he’s not sure how the committee would work with a more remote agent or company handling the claims.  Everyone might feel more comfortable and not need that input, but it also might not be something practical from the administrator’s point of view, and maybe not even legal.  We need to look at how the Self-Insurance Fund is administered now versus other ways to do it.

 

            Mr. Wilson pointed out that if a person has a claim with other insurances, the agent really doesn’t know what happened and right away denies the claim.  With self-insurance, you may have to pay first and be reimbursed, but at least there is someone there to talk to.  It’s time for one of the legislators that knows about insurance to take over the plan administration and have representatives from all the groups work together. Phone conversations will not solve the problems.  Chairman Crandall commented that no matter who makes the decision, whether it’s self-insurance with a local administrator or an insurance company, with the insurance, it would be rare to talk with someone making the decision.  Mr. Wilson stated that claimants will be better off talking with a local person, rather than someone on the phone.  Mr. Truax commented that he would not support any change that didn’t include having a local representative to talk to.

 

            Mr. Pullen pointed out that when dealing with larger insurance companies, there is a local agent that acts as a go-between.  Our Self-Insurance Plan is small enough that we have only the Executive Secretary and we don’t get to the level where an agent advocates for the policy holder.  The problem is logistics and overhead for the program.  However, Mr. Pullen doesn’t see the Executive Secretary in an adversarial role; he is there to administer the program according to the law.  Self-insurance requires the County and one other entity in the County to agree to participate.  We have had good service at a good cost.  Of course, we’re always trying to not have claims and to avoid accidents, but the other part is that not every injury or loss is covered under any policy.  We’re getting Workers’ Compensation coverage for what’s covered under the law.  Previously the Personnel Committee directed going to the Fire Advisory Board to address issues such as the definition of a member and who is covered under Workers’ Compensation.  That’s only the tip of the iceberg.  Communication is needed, and we haven’t succeeded as well as we could have.  Mr. Luckey noted that the committee idea would help with that communication.

 

            Chairman Crandall questioned the wording of the sample resolution in #2.  At first glance, it makes sense, but if the resolution goes above and beyond what the laws read, it could be a major decision of this Board.  The resolution is in support of the firemen and expedience in clarifying and administering what’s in the law, but if it goes on and uses the “good Samaritan” idea and goes beyond what the law covers, we need to clarify the wording and what the bottom line of the resolution is. 

 

            Mr. Luckey explained that “good Samaritan” is used only to clarify that gray area of the period of time prior to the tones going off.  If a fireman responds within his fire district in the capacity as trained before the tones go off, he is acting in the line of duty.  They are not just covered when the tones go off.  For instance, firemen are covered for attending meetings.  Mr. Luckey is covered for this meeting because he was asked to come speak as a representative of his fire company.  This resolution would address that gray area of assisting someone prior to tones going off.

 

            County Attorney Thomas Miner noted that the Fire Benefits Law would need to be changed prior to considering the proposed resolution.  It’s too ambiguous.  The County could not effect a change of law through a resolution, but could send a resolution to Albany in support of a change in legislation.  Chairman Crandall pointed out that we regularly request this type of supporting or clarifying resolutions.  Mr. Luckey noted that there are some legislative bills already being considered in the Senate.  If we could go together in support, it would be good.

 

            Mr. Truax noted that the booklet handed out by Mr. Luckey covers most of the situations referred to, regardless of tones, under the line of duty section.  He’s not sure if these concerns will require a change in law, or just interpretation.

 

            Mr. Pullen commented on earlier discussions he has had with Mr. Luckey on when coverage kicks in, where it applies, and so on.  Coverage depends on where the incident takes place and where the fireman is a member.  There are state agencies and legal counsel that could help with drawing up the language for legislation changes for this Board to review.  That would be a good place to begin if we need legislation from Albany.  If it’s the opinion of the State Comptroller and the Workers’ Compensation Board that what we request exceeds the law, the firefighters have clout with their legislators, and other agencies would join them.  What are the alternatives?  It’s either volunteer or paid service.  We clearly need to work together.

 

            Mr. Luckey requested that the County Attorney review their proposed resolution.  It was written by a lawyer who is also a fireman, and in his opinion is within the confines of the law.  Chairman Crandall commented that if there is specific legislation that would benefit the County and emergency services membership, we should support it.  Mr. Dibble requested legislative bill numbers so the Board can review the information and refer it on to the Inter-County Association of Western New York for support.  Chairman Crandall explained that representatives from nineteen counties attend the Inter-County meetings to discuss and support issues affecting the counties.  Supporting resolutions are also referred to the New York State Association of Counties (NYSAC), so issues are now being heard from a large group rather than just one voice in Albany.

 

            Chairman Crandall commented on the regular attendance of Board members at the Fire Advisory Board meetings mentioned in #5.  He apologized and noted there should be someone from the Public Safety Committee or himself or a couple of legislators attending on a regular basis.  This concern is easy to clear up and is very important.  It goes back to communication and to comments made by the Sheriff – we have to know what the others are doing.  Chairman Crandall noted that he and the Public Safety Committee members are notified of Fire Advisory Board meeting dates, and he will see that everyone on the Board is notified.  Mr. Kruger noted that no Board member is attending EMS Council meetings, so legislators will need notification of those meetings also.

 

            Chairman Crandall remarked on the radio system and procedures in the E-911 Dispatch Center, referring back to the Sheriff’s comments.  Some excellent points and ideas were discussed in the last Public Safety Committee toward getting the users of the 911 system to understand equipment changes and software updates.  He pointed out that just a few years ago, if there was an emergency situation someone ran next door or drove somewhere to make a call and maybe a few neighbors called.  Now cars stop and make cell phone calls, and it’s not unusual for Dispatch to receive a couple dozen calls.  When the need arises, it’s important that the technology and training are there, and it all comes down to communication.  For all the cell phones, software, equipment, and the millions spent on technology for communication on an instant basis, we still don’t have good communication between ourselves.

 

            Regarding the radio concern, Mr. O’Grady noted that about five years ago, there was a committee to address communication which was spearheaded by the Sheriff at that time.  It seemed to be a good channel of communication, and the only time for police and firemen from different parts of the County to express their concerns with the Dispatch Center.  It might be time to bring that idea back, maybe on a quarterly basis.  State government is pushing for communication between agencies.  A recent example came to light when Mr. O’Grady heard of a grant possibility and spoke at an Alfred Town meeting to promote compatibility between fire departments.  Russ Hall spoke up and said he was already working on that grant.  That type of thing needs to be communicated.  The committee he spoke of disbanded, for reasons he’s unsure of, but when it was active, people had a place to vent, and the Sheriff was made aware of their concerns.

 

            Sheriff Tompkins responded that one of his concerns would be the additional time commitment for the volunteers, but it’s a great idea.  With all the technology and equipment they do have, they can address any issues or concerns.  The answer is there.  He wants to see the users, the Firemen and EMS personnel, understand how the equipment works and why problems occur in order for them to have confidence in the system.  It’s not an issue of having a horrible system; the system is working.  There are occasional issues and they are dealt with as well as possible.  Chairman Crandall noted that personnel in the Dispatch Center may have questions of the users also.  Instead of a committee, the Sheriff had the idea of user informational type meetings.  Maybe this could be a user group meeting to get information and ideas out there.  Sheriff Tompkins commented that this is not the volunteers’ problem.  He and Russ Hall can solve the issues by going to the firefighters’ scheduled meetings, rather than having them spend more of their time in additional meetings.

 

            Chairman Crandall felt these issues should be referred to the Public Safety Committee, and he will speak with the County Attorney about them.  Information from the fire service groups about the proposed resolution should be given to the Clerk of the Board to be distributed to the County Attorney and Public Safety Committee members.  We’ll see what can be done to answer the questions that were brought up.

 

            Chairman Crandall thanked those in attendance representing over 1,200 firemen.  Their membership constitutes half of what the Self-Insurance Plan covers for employees and volunteers of the County, Towns, Villages, Firefighters, and EMS personnel.  The input that they brought forward is needed and appreciated, and the County will need time to go through the information, run it through committee and channels to address it, and get a response back to them.  This could take whatever direction they’d like in order to get information to their membership.  If another meeting is to be set up, it may be easier to meet with those elected by the groups, as occurred with this meeting, or it could go through the boards and committees.  That can be communicated as the process moves along.  Communication is key.

 

Adjournment:  the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Adele Finnemore, Journal Clerk